The Incidence of Screw Failure in Fenestrated Polyaxial Pedicle Screws vs. Conventional Pedicle Screws in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS).

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a spinal pathology affecting 0.47-5.2% of the population, often requiring surgical intervention to control deformity progression. Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion with pedicle screw fixation are standard procedures for AIS curve correction; however, implant failure remains a significant complication, especially in multi-level fusions. This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the failure rates between conventional pedicle screws (CPSs) and fenestrated pedicle screws (FPSs) in AIS treatment, with a focus on investigating potential causes of these failures. Methods: This study, conducted from January 2016 to December 2020, involves a two-center retrospective analysis of AIS patients undergoing posterior instrumented fusion. Results: Data from a total of 162 patients (122 females and 40 males) revealed a mean age of 14.95 years (range: 11-18). The CPS group consisted of 80 patients (56 females and 24 males), whereas the FPS group consisted of 82 patients (66 females and 16 males) stratified by Risser grade and Lenke Classification. Radiological assessments, clinical outcomes, and SRS-22 scores were evaluated pre-operatively, at 6 months, and post-operatively (minimum follow-up of 2 years). Conclusions: Fenestrated pedicle screws (FPSs) pose concerns due to their lower mechanical strength compared to solid screws. Understanding their limitations and optimizing their application in AIS treatment is essential.

Positioning accuracy and facet joints violation after percutaneous pedicle screws placement with robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided technique: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Minimally invasive spine surgery became the gold standard for the treatment of many spinal diseases. Only a few comparative studies were performed regarding the superiority of robotic-assisted (RA) surgery over fluoroscopic guidance (FG) surgery during percutaneous pedicle screws placement. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy and potential advantages of RA compared with FG. Material and Methods: This study is a systematic literature review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The review questions were formulated following the PICO scheme. Measured outcomes were presented using Forest plots. Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the χ2 test, and the I2 statistic was utilized to estimate the proportion of total variation among the studies. A value exceeding 50% was considered indicative of substantial heterogeneity. Results: Seven studies that met inclusion criteria were finally included in this meta-analysis. These seven studies include: 447 patients, 228 patients (931 screws) treated with robotic guide, and 219 patients (767 pedicle screws) using fluoroscopic guide, with a mean age of 55.2. The percentages of clinically acceptable screws were 94.3% in the robot-assisted group and 89% in the fluoroscopic guided group. The percentages of non-acceptable screws were 5.7% in the robot-assisted group and 11% in the fluoroscopic-guided group. Discussion: Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of radiographic and clinical outcomes, with the robotic-assisted pedicle screw group exhibiting longer operative times. Robot technology serves as a valuable tool for assisting surgeons in challenging scenarios such as anatomical variants or patients with spinal deformities, ensuring accurate screw placement. Conclusion: The accuracy of pedicle screw placement with robotic technology is higher than with FG. In fact, the robotic approach allows significantly lower complication rates, fewer cases of violation of the proximal articular facet, less intraoperative exposure to radiation, even if it requires longer surgical times than the FG technique.

Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity: A Narrative Review about Imaging Findings.

Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a disorder caused by repetitive overloading, which leads to progressive posterior tibialis tendon (PTT) insufficiency. It mainly affects middle-aged women and occurs with foot pain, malalignment, and loss of function. After clinical examination, imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and management of this pathology. Imaging allows confirmation of the diagnosis, monitoring of the disorder, outcome assessment and complication identification. Weight-bearing radiography of the foot and ankle are gold standard for the diagnosis of AAFD. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is not routinely needed for the diagnosis; however, it can be used to evaluate the spring ligament and the degree of PTT damage which can help to guide surgical plans and management in patients with severe deformity. Ultrasonography (US) can be considered another helpful tool to evaluate the condition of the PTT and other soft-tissue structures. Computed Tomography (CT) provides enhanced, detailed visualization of the hindfoot, and it is useful both in the evaluation of bone abnormalities and in the accurate evaluation of measurements useful for diagnosis and post-surgical follow-up. Other state-of-the-art imaging examinations, like multiplanar weight-bearing imaging, are emerging as techniques for diagnosis and preoperative planning but are not yet standardized and their scope of application is not yet well defined. The aim of this review, performed through Pubmed and Web of Science databases, was to analyze the literature relating to the role of imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of AAFD.